Dear Decaturish – Low-income families shouldn’t cover cost of EV chargers.Baoky Vu
We accept letters to the editor. Letters to the editor are opinions of the authors of the letter, not Decaturish.com. Everyone has an equal opportunity to submit a letter to the editor. So if you read something here and don’t like it, don’t jump on our case. Write a letter of your own. All letters must be signed. We reserve the right to edit letters for length and content. To send your letter to the editor, email it to firstname.lastname@example.org.
As a member of the House Transportation Committee, Representative Hank Johnson is uniquely positioned to help move our transportation system forward. The transportation sector is our nation’s leading greenhouse gas emitter, so to reduce our carbon footprint we need to address our transportation emissions.
Unfortunately, some view electric vehicles (EVs) as a silver bullet to addressing this issue. But new research shows that in places where the electric grid is still heavily reliant upon coal, like Georgia, EVs could actually produce more pollution overall than traditional vehicles.
Therefore, it is disappointing to see some policies being pushed to promote EV usage at the expense of low-income families, like in the recently passed House Transportation bill.
A policy included in the bill would allow utility companies to increase the electric bills on their customers to pay for EV charging stations, in addition to receiving federal grants. While the lack of charging stations is clearly a hindrance to the adoption of EVs, low-income families should not have their heating bills increased to cover the construction of EV chargers.
As Congress hammers out the differences between the transportation packages passed in both the House and the Senate, I hope Representative Johnson will oppose using the “utility model” to build EV chargers.
– Baoky Vu
Want Decaturish delivered to your inbox every day? Sign up for our free newsletter by clicking here.